{"items":[{"id":"T1-01","period":"T1","branch":"trunk","axis":"ask","domain":"welfare","level":"L0","opinion":"qualified","question":{"ko":"신청자 W-2231(가상)은 부양의무자 소득 인정액이 기준 중위소득 100%(가상 기준)를 3만 원 초과해 '부적격'으로 표시됐다. 이번 분기 안에 이대로 최종 승인해도 되는가?","en":"Applicant W-2231 (fictional) was flagged 'ineligible' because the recognized income of the family member legally responsible for supporting them exceeded 100% of the median-income standard (a fictional threshold) by 30,000 won. Can this determination be given final approval as it stands within this quarter?"},"asOf":"2026-10-14"},{"id":"T1-02","period":"T1","branch":"trunk","axis":"open","domain":"finance","level":"L1","opinion":"unqualified","question":{"ko":"이번 분기 대손충당금을 매출채권의 4.2%로 설정한 판단 기록을 볼 수 있는가?","en":"Can we see the judgment record behind setting this quarter's bad-debt allowance at 4.2% of receivables?"},"asOf":"2026-10-29"},{"id":"T1-03","period":"T1","branch":"trunk","axis":"correct","domain":"justice","level":"L2","opinion":"qualified","question":{"ko":"12조 개인정보 위탁 조항이 법 위반 소지 '낮음'으로 판단됐다. 이번 달 안에 계약을 체결해도 되는가?","en":"Clause 12, on outsourcing personal-data processing, was judged to carry a 'low' risk of violating the law. Can the contract be signed within the month?"},"asOf":"2026-11-10"},{"id":"T1-04","period":"T1","branch":"trunk","axis":"verify","domain":"platform","level":"L3","opinion":"adverse","question":{"ko":"이번 배포로 응답 지연이 12% 줄었다는 보고가 있다. 이 수치가 다른 트래픽 구간에서도 재현되는가?","en":"This deployment reportedly cut response latency by 12%. Does that figure reproduce across other traffic windows?"},"asOf":"2026-11-25"},{"id":"T1-05","period":"T1","branch":"trunk","axis":"work","domain":"labor","level":"L4","opinion":"qualified","question":{"ko":"1차 상담의 68%를 자동 응대로 넘기면 인력을 몇 명까지 줄일 수 있는가?","en":"If 68% of first-contact inquiries move to automated response, how many staff positions can be cut?"},"asOf":"2026-12-08"},{"id":"T1-06","period":"T1","branch":"trunk","axis":"accord","domain":"labor","level":"L4","opinion":"disclaimer","question":{"ko":"","en":"Can a judgment made by a US provider's model be replicated on a model from a second provider in another country when the top two actors hold 58% of frontier compute and no inputs are published?"},"asOf":"2026-11-24"},{"id":"T1-07","period":"T1","branch":"trunk","axis":"accord","domain":"finance","level":"L1","opinion":"qualified","question":{"ko":"","en":"This record asks whether a day-long task performed by a foreign provider's P-3 can be audited from Seoul when no state shares compute records or audit access and the nearest rival trails by six months."},"asOf":"2026-11-19"},{"id":"T1-08","period":"T1","branch":"trunk","axis":"poles","domain":"platform","level":"L3","opinion":"qualified","question":{"ko":"","en":"Can a batch of marketplace suspensions proposed by one provider's model be trusted when no second provider's model is available to check it against and the top two actors hold 58% of frontier compute (hypothetical)?"},"asOf":"2026-11-09"},{"id":"T2-01","period":"T2","branch":"trunk","axis":"ask","domain":"platform","level":"L0","opinion":"qualified","question":{"ko":"P-4가 결제 모듈 리팩터링 범위를 스스로 정했다. 배포 전 사람이 검토해야 할 항목을 무엇으로 좁혀야 하는가?","en":"P-4 set its own scope for the payment-module refactor. What should the pre-deployment human review be narrowed to?"},"asOf":"2027-01-12"},{"id":"T2-02","period":"T2","branch":"trunk","axis":"poles","domain":"security","level":"L1","opinion":"adverse","question":{"ko":"Hanlin의 HL-3 추격을 늦추기 위해 특정 등급 이상 연산 장비 수출을 이번 분기부터 제한해야 하는가?","en":"Should exports of equipment above a certain compute grade be restricted from this quarter onward to slow the catch-up by Hanlin's HL-3?"},"asOf":"2027-01-27"},{"id":"T2-03","period":"T2","branch":"trunk","axis":"verify","domain":"science","level":"L2","opinion":"qualified","question":{"ko":"P-4가 자체 보고한 정렬 시험 통과율 94%가 외부 재현 시험에서도 같게 나오는가?","en":"P-4 self-reported a 94% pass rate on alignment tests. Does that hold under external reproduction?"},"asOf":"2027-02-09"},{"id":"T2-04","period":"T2","branch":"trunk","axis":"worth","domain":"finance","level":"L4","opinion":"qualified","question":{"ko":"이번 '스냅샷 이사'에 든 재현 비용 340만 원(가상)을 이번 분기 손익에 일회성 비용으로 반영해도 되는가?","en":"Can the 3.4 million won (fictional) reproduction cost of this 'snapshot migration' be booked to this quarter's profit and loss as a one-time expense?"},"asOf":"2027-02-24"},{"id":"T2-05","period":"T2","branch":"trunk","axis":"accord","domain":"governance","level":"L5","opinion":"qualified","question":{"ko":"Hanlin 측에 연산 등록부 초안 공유를 이번 분기 안에 먼저 제안해야 하는가, 자국 산업 보호를 이유로 미뤄야 하는가?","en":"Should we be the first to offer, within this quarter, to share a draft compute registry with Hanlin, or hold off to protect domestic industry?"},"asOf":"2027-03-15"},{"id":"T2-06","period":"T2","branch":"trunk","axis":"open","domain":"justice","level":"L3","opinion":"qualified","question":{"ko":"","en":"Can a P-4 mediation ruling that publishes only its result, evidence list and cutoff date be relied on or challenged when the assumptions and revision conditions behind it are withheld?"},"asOf":"2027-02-18"},{"id":"T2-07","period":"T2","branch":"trunk","axis":"work","domain":"energy","level":"L0","opinion":"adverse","question":{"ko":"","en":"This record asks whether a one-person company can hand a three-day scheduling task to a cheaper new model and keep the output, when the two models disagree and no one has written down why."},"asOf":"2027-03-01"},{"id":"T2-08","period":"T2","branch":"trunk","axis":"work","domain":"health","level":"L1","opinion":"adverse","question":{"ko":"","en":"Can a hospital accept a three-day software task completed unsupervised by P-4 and retire the two in-house developers who would have reviewed it, without re-running the task on another model first?"},"asOf":"2027-03-08"},{"id":"T2-09","period":"T2","branch":"trunk","axis":"open","domain":"finance","level":"L6","opinion":"qualified","question":{"ko":"","en":"When a filing rests on a P-4 credit classification, which parts of the judgment record must be published so that a second auditor can replicate it, and who answers an appeal against it?"},"asOf":"2027-02-24"},{"id":"T3-01","period":"T3","branch":"trunk","axis":"open","domain":"finance","level":"L0","opinion":"qualified","question":{"ko":"(주)가상건설의 회사채가 '지속 불가'로 하향됐다. 그 판단 근거를 채권 보유자에게 공개할 수 있는가?","en":"Fictional Co. Hypothetical Construction's corporate bond was downgraded to 'unsustainable.' Can the grounds be disclosed to bondholders?"},"asOf":"2027-04-08"},{"id":"T3-02","period":"T3","branch":"trunk","axis":"correct","domain":"labor","level":"L1","opinion":"disclaimer","question":{"ko":"지원자의 기여 점수가 하위 15%로 나와 서류에서 탈락했다. 이의를 제기하면 무엇을 근거로 재심할 수 있는가?","en":"An applicant's contribution score placed them in the bottom 15%, and they were screened out at the resume stage. If they appeal, what can the review be based on?"},"asOf":"2027-04-22"},{"id":"T3-03","period":"T3","branch":"trunk","axis":"poles","domain":"platform","level":"L3","opinion":"adverse","question":{"ko":"상위 두 재평가 모델의 시장 점유가 62%(가상)다. 이 둘이 같은 채권을 동시에 '매도' 판단하면 어떤 손실이 발생하는가?","en":"The top two re-rating models hold a 62% (fictional) market share. What losses follow if both flag the same bond as 'sell' at the same time?"},"asOf":"2027-05-06"},{"id":"T3-04","period":"T3","branch":"trunk","axis":"verify","domain":"governance","level":"L4","opinion":"qualified","question":{"ko":"이번 스프레드 급등을 재평가 모델이 사전에 '경고'로 표시한 비율은 얼마인가?","en":"What share of this spread spike did the re-rating model flag as a warning in advance?"},"asOf":"2027-05-19"},{"id":"T3-05","period":"T3","branch":"trunk","axis":"work","domain":"justice","level":"L6","opinion":"qualified","question":{"ko":"기여 점수를 쓰는 모든 채용 기업에 공통으로 적용할 교차 감사 절차를 이번 분기 안에 만들 수 있는가?","en":"Can a cross-audit procedure that applies to every company using contribution scores in hiring be built within this quarter?"},"asOf":"2027-06-10"},{"id":"T3-06","period":"T3","branch":"trunk","axis":"accord","domain":"infrastructure","level":"L2","opinion":"adverse","question":{"ko":"","en":"This record asks whether auditors in the country that issued the bond can reach the trace (the step-by-step log of inputs and results) behind a re-rating already circulating across borders, when the provider has not supplied that trace for this audit and no registry of compute or audit access exists yet."},"asOf":"2027-04-15"},{"id":"T3-07","period":"T3","branch":"trunk","axis":"accord","domain":"education","level":"L6","opinion":"unqualified","question":{"ko":"","en":"This record asks whether a rule can be adopted that requires member states to let each other re-run AI essay-scoring judgments on another provider's model and to publish the conditions for revising a score, when only two members have tested it."},"asOf":"2027-05-20"}],"total":236,"page":1,"pages":10,"pageSize":24,"collection":236,"facets":{"branch":{"trunk":87,"I":80,"II":69},"period":{"T1":8,"T2":9,"T3":13,"T4":8,"T5":9,"T6":9,"T7":10,"T8":10,"T9":11,"I1":10,"I2":7,"I3":11,"I4":9,"I5":11,"I6":13,"I7":9,"I8":10,"II1":8,"II2":7,"II3":9,"II4":7,"II5":11,"II6":8,"II7":9,"II8":10},"axis":{"ask":26,"open":28,"correct":28,"verify":30,"work":23,"accord":28,"poles":35,"worth":38},"domain":{"welfare":21,"finance":18,"justice":21,"platform":25,"labor":20,"security":16,"science":15,"governance":26,"energy":18,"health":18,"infrastructure":7,"education":19,"culture":12},"level":{"L0":29,"L1":33,"L2":33,"L3":39,"L4":38,"L5":34,"L6":30},"opinion":{"qualified":75,"unqualified":24,"adverse":62,"disclaimer":75}}}